The discussion suggests that neutral laws of general applicability, which do not target religion, are often upheld by the Supreme Court.
A key argument is that the statute requires notice about available government services, distinguishing it from cases like Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores Inc. , which involved religious objections to contraceptive coverage.
This post provides a brief overview of the legal debate regarding mandatory notices for reproductive services. The comparison to the Hobby Lobby case? How neutral laws are defined in this context?
